Et bien écoute, merci, je ne savais pas que c’était un signe de pollinisation, mais cette désorganisation qui m’avait bien accroché l’oeil, ajouté à l’angle de ta prise de vue de cette fleur: cela faisait pour moi une photo formidable!
A vrai dire, c’est plus un questionnement qu’une affirmation. Mes cours de biologie végétale ayant bien 20 ans d’ancienneté, je ne me souviens plus très bien si il y a une relation entre la désorganisation des pistils couverts de pollen vus sur cette photo (contrairement aux autres) et la pollinisation en elle-même.
En tout cas, encore merci 🙂
Yummy! 😀
I think then, after observation, and not shown in these images, that my blur comes from trying to get my camera lens to work in too close of a distance to my subject. It also appears that the area of clear focus, or depth of field, or both are much more greatly limited. I am also having trouble with motion. I also wonder, since my eyes are very bad and I use another pair of glasses for reading now where the prescription is very different, if I need to use those for image taking, though they only focus on objects so far out from my eyes. I also don’t understand how to tell what kind of lens is on my camera. I know it’s the close up one. I also have one that comes off for distant type images. It isn’t my favorite. I prefer to use my Kodak for that one as then I can zoom on a distant image and get detail. Ooops I didn’t have tea yet. I should have begun with reminding you that I was hopping up and down noticing how your macro shots were looking and coming out. I was taking the errors in my work more personally than was perhaps necessary. Does your camera make up for shake or does the lens ability help that not to cause negative effect?
🙂
Indeed, each lens has a minimal focusing distance (usually, it is mentioned somewhere in its manual or on the lens itself. Regarding the area of clear focus, that distance is controlled by the setting of the aperture of your lens (a small aperture like f/16 will allow you to have a wider area of clear focus … but less light is coming in your camera so the speed as to be slow which can make it difficult to take good pictures if you have to handle you camera. a large aperture like f/2 or less will, on the contrary, let a lot of light to reach the sensor thus you can use a faster speed and your photos will not get blurry … but the area of clear focus will be very tiny). Unfortunately, I cannot help you regarding you glasses (I do not wear any … yet) … I would say that you should use the one you are using for reading … but I don’t really know. Maybe you can set up your visor so it will feat with your vision and you will not need to wear your glasses. Lenses … you have different type of lenses for macro. Either you buy a real macro lens like mine or you can also just add a small lens on the top of any kind of lens you are using. This is not perfect in terms of quality but it will allow you to reduce that minimal focusing distance I was talking about above and it is way much cheaper than a real lens ! Finally, my camera has an anti-shaking system directly embedded in its body so I can mount whatever lens I want, they will all be stabilized (even the very old ones). This system is the reason why I chose that camera from Olympus instead of the Panasonic line of micro 4/3 that is compatible with Olympus in terms of lenses (I wanted to be able to use some old lenses from the 1970s that I have and enjoy a good stabilization system). Enjoy you tea !!! 🙂
Comme à ton habitude, de magnifiques photos ! Elles font rêver et donner envie d’être minuscule pour se promener au milieu de ces fleurs. Ils en ont de la chance les insectes finalement =)
Télécharger, utiliser, copier, modifier et publier une de mes photographie sans mon accord est un acte de contrefaçon. Ceci constitue un délit mais n'hésitez pas à me demander l'autorisation :) ...
De la même manière, si cela vous dérange d'apparaitre sur une de mes photos, n'hésitez surtout pas à m'en faire part et je la retirerai immédiatement.
Mathias Lucas
Copyright
Download, use, copy, modify and publish one of my photographs without my consent is an act of piracy. This is an offense but do not hesitate to ask for permission :) ... Similarly, if you happen to appear on one of my photos, please feel free to let me know and I will immediately remove it. Mathias Lucas
Retrouvez mathiasl sur Hellocoton
mathiaslphotos
La 2 est magnifique!!!
As-tu remarqué que les pistiles (bleus) étaient totalement désorganisée sur la 2 comparé aux autres photos ? Signe de pollinisation ?
Et bien écoute, merci, je ne savais pas que c’était un signe de pollinisation, mais cette désorganisation qui m’avait bien accroché l’oeil, ajouté à l’angle de ta prise de vue de cette fleur: cela faisait pour moi une photo formidable!
A vrai dire, c’est plus un questionnement qu’une affirmation. Mes cours de biologie végétale ayant bien 20 ans d’ancienneté, je ne me souviens plus très bien si il y a une relation entre la désorganisation des pistils couverts de pollen vus sur cette photo (contrairement aux autres) et la pollinisation en elle-même.
En tout cas, encore merci 🙂
C’est genial la macro, merci car je découvre plein de choses…
Des mondes dans notre monde…
Mais de rien 🙂
Moi aussi, je me régale 😉
C’est pas pour rien que j’ai fait de la biologie pendante des années 😀
Simply gorgeous images
Thank you very much !!!
Great macros! The last one is my favourite!
Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 😉
Thanks Nancy !!
Ca aussi, on en mangerait ! sauf la dernière ! Merci c’est superbe ! Bonne journée !
Manger des fleurs ?? 🙂
Bon week-end !!
Qu’est-ce que c’est beau!!!
🙂
Yummy! 😀
I think then, after observation, and not shown in these images, that my blur comes from trying to get my camera lens to work in too close of a distance to my subject. It also appears that the area of clear focus, or depth of field, or both are much more greatly limited. I am also having trouble with motion. I also wonder, since my eyes are very bad and I use another pair of glasses for reading now where the prescription is very different, if I need to use those for image taking, though they only focus on objects so far out from my eyes. I also don’t understand how to tell what kind of lens is on my camera. I know it’s the close up one. I also have one that comes off for distant type images. It isn’t my favorite. I prefer to use my Kodak for that one as then I can zoom on a distant image and get detail. Ooops I didn’t have tea yet. I should have begun with reminding you that I was hopping up and down noticing how your macro shots were looking and coming out. I was taking the errors in my work more personally than was perhaps necessary. Does your camera make up for shake or does the lens ability help that not to cause negative effect?
🙂
Indeed, each lens has a minimal focusing distance (usually, it is mentioned somewhere in its manual or on the lens itself. Regarding the area of clear focus, that distance is controlled by the setting of the aperture of your lens (a small aperture like f/16 will allow you to have a wider area of clear focus … but less light is coming in your camera so the speed as to be slow which can make it difficult to take good pictures if you have to handle you camera. a large aperture like f/2 or less will, on the contrary, let a lot of light to reach the sensor thus you can use a faster speed and your photos will not get blurry … but the area of clear focus will be very tiny). Unfortunately, I cannot help you regarding you glasses (I do not wear any … yet) … I would say that you should use the one you are using for reading … but I don’t really know. Maybe you can set up your visor so it will feat with your vision and you will not need to wear your glasses. Lenses … you have different type of lenses for macro. Either you buy a real macro lens like mine or you can also just add a small lens on the top of any kind of lens you are using. This is not perfect in terms of quality but it will allow you to reduce that minimal focusing distance I was talking about above and it is way much cheaper than a real lens ! Finally, my camera has an anti-shaking system directly embedded in its body so I can mount whatever lens I want, they will all be stabilized (even the very old ones). This system is the reason why I chose that camera from Olympus instead of the Panasonic line of micro 4/3 that is compatible with Olympus in terms of lenses (I wanted to be able to use some old lenses from the 1970s that I have and enjoy a good stabilization system). Enjoy you tea !!! 🙂
*_* (oui, c’est constructif)
😀 (ça aussi !!)
Excellent macro shots!
Thanks a lot !!!
Amazing details and all very beautiful 🙂
I could spend hours in my mums grade, taking such pictures 🙂
Thanks Inga
C’est très beau!
Merci !!
A reblogué ceci sur Sophie L. and commented:
Add your thoughts here… (optional)
Encore merci Sophie !
Wow these are amazing, especially the last photo with the bumble bee. That close up shot is superb! Lisa
Thank a lot Lisa … But I have to admit that I was slightly frustrated with bumblebees that day ! None of them agreed to show me their faces !! 😀
Haha lol… I tried to take pictures of a bumblebee in our garden last month and it was the same. I was impressed by your photo 😀
😀
Thanks !
What lovely details and those colours – almost surprising!
Thanks a lot Karen !! I really love that blue !
Comme à ton habitude, de magnifiques photos ! Elles font rêver et donner envie d’être minuscule pour se promener au milieu de ces fleurs. Ils en ont de la chance les insectes finalement =)
Merci !!! 🙂
Oui, ils ont de la chance … et nous, on a juste les lentilles macro, jaloux que nous sommes 😉
Amazing work!! You have talent!
Thanks you very much Laura !!!
superbe merci pour toutes ces beautés !!
Mais de rien, il faut remercier la nature 😉
I enjoyed the series.
Thanks a lot !
Merci pour cette belle série de macro
Mais de rien 🙂
Yes! so much yes!!!
Hehehe 🙂
Connais tu le nom de la fleur sur ces photos?
Aucune idée pour la première et la dernière mais hormis une rose au milieu, les fleurs aux pistils bleus sont des dimorphotéca.